Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, Comprehensive
Case Report, Cornea
Case Report, Glaucoma
Case Report, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Case Report, Plastics
Case Report, Retina
Case Report, Uveitis
Case Series Retina
Case Series, Cornea
Case Series, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Comprehensive, Editorial
Comprehensive, Original Article
Comprehensive, Review Article
Editorial
Glaucoma, Case Report
Glaucoma, Original Article
Glaucoma, Pictorial Essay
Media & News
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Original Article
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Review Article
Original Article
Original Article, Comprehensive
Original Article, Cornea
Original Article, Glaucoma
Original Article, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Original Article, Retina
Pictorial Essay, Comprehensive
Pictorial Essay, Cornea
Pictorial Essay, Plastics
Pictorial Essay, Retina
Plastics, Case Report
Retina Pictorial Essay
Retina, Case Series
Retina, Original Article
Retina, Review Article
Review Article
Review Article, Retina
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, Comprehensive
Case Report, Cornea
Case Report, Glaucoma
Case Report, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Case Report, Plastics
Case Report, Retina
Case Report, Uveitis
Case Series Retina
Case Series, Cornea
Case Series, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Comprehensive, Editorial
Comprehensive, Original Article
Comprehensive, Review Article
Editorial
Glaucoma, Case Report
Glaucoma, Original Article
Glaucoma, Pictorial Essay
Media & News
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Original Article
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Review Article
Original Article
Original Article, Comprehensive
Original Article, Cornea
Original Article, Glaucoma
Original Article, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Original Article, Retina
Pictorial Essay, Comprehensive
Pictorial Essay, Cornea
Pictorial Essay, Plastics
Pictorial Essay, Retina
Plastics, Case Report
Retina Pictorial Essay
Retina, Case Series
Retina, Original Article
Retina, Review Article
Review Article
Review Article, Retina
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, Comprehensive
Case Report, Cornea
Case Report, Glaucoma
Case Report, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Case Report, Plastics
Case Report, Retina
Case Report, Uveitis
Case Series Retina
Case Series, Cornea
Case Series, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Comprehensive, Editorial
Comprehensive, Original Article
Comprehensive, Review Article
Editorial
Glaucoma, Case Report
Glaucoma, Original Article
Glaucoma, Pictorial Essay
Media & News
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Original Article
Neuro-ophthalmology/Oncology, Review Article
Original Article
Original Article, Comprehensive
Original Article, Cornea
Original Article, Glaucoma
Original Article, Neurophthalmology/Oncology
Original Article, Retina
Pictorial Essay, Comprehensive
Pictorial Essay, Cornea
Pictorial Essay, Plastics
Pictorial Essay, Retina
Plastics, Case Report
Retina Pictorial Essay
Retina, Case Series
Retina, Original Article
Retina, Review Article
Review Article
Review Article, Retina
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
Cornea
2026
:9;
4
doi:
10.25259/LAJO_23_2025

Missed type 2 big bubble as an under-recognized cause of post-deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty double anterior chamber: A case report

Department of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Author image
Corresponding author: Parul Jain, Department of Ophthalmology, Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India. pjain811@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Jain P, Bansal K, Pradhan A, Rangari P. Missed type 2 big bubble as an under-recognized cause of post-deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty double anterior chamber: A case report. Lat Am J Ophthalmol. 2026;9:4. doi: 10.25259/LAJO_23_2025

Abstract

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is commonly performed for stromal corneal pathology with healthy endothelium. Double anterior chamber is a recognized early postoperative complication, usually attributed to microperforation of Descemet membrane. We report an unusual case of early postoperative double anterior chamber following DALK in a 16-year-old girl with advanced keratoconus, caused by an unrecognized intraoperative type 2 big bubble. During pneumatic dissection, diffuse stromal whitening occurred after repeated air injection and no definite big bubble was appreciated intraoperatively. On the first postoperative day, a double anterior chamber was noted, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirmed Descemet membrane detachment. By day 3, partial resorption of the interface air revealed a central Descemet membrane tear. Retrospective review of the surgical video demonstrated a fleeting, thin, central bubble consistent with a missed type 2 big bubble. The patient was successfully managed with intracameral air descemetopexy combined with transcorneal suturing, resulting in complete reattachment of Descemet membrane and a favorable visual outcome. This case highlights missed type 2 big bubble as an under-recognized mechanism of postoperative double anterior chamber after DALK and emphasizes the importance of intraoperative recognition, preventive strategies, and timely intervention.

Keywords

Advanced keratoconus
Air descemetopexy
Corneal surgery complications
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty
Descemet’s membrane detachment
Double anterior chamber
Transcorneal suturing
Type 2 big bubble

INTRODUCTION

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is preferred for corneal ectasias and stromal pathologies that spare Descemet membrane (DM). It preserves the host endothelium and prevents endothelial rejection, offering longer graft survival than penetrating keratoplasty. Among DALK techniques, the big-bubble (BB) method described by Anwar and Teichmann creates a smooth dissection plane by injecting air into the deep stroma to separate it from the DM.

Two distinct BB types are recognized. Type 1 BB forms between deep stroma and the preDescemet (Dua’s) layer – centrally located, opaque, and feathery-margined. Type 2 BB, however, forms between Dua’s layer and true DM – thin, transparent, peripheral, and fragile.[1-3] Type 2 BBs are rare but more rupture-prone, especially in advanced keratoconus.

A post-operative double anterior chamber (AC) is a known early complication of DALK, most often due to DM microperforation. However, it may also occur after an apparently uneventful surgery, secondary to residual viscoelastic, incomplete adhesion, or undetected type 2 bubble formation.[4-6] We present a case where a missed type 2 BB caused early post-operative double AC – an overlooked mechanism not widely recognized in the literature.

CASE REPORT

A 16-year-old girl presented with bilateral advanced keratoconus. The right eye had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 and severe corneal thinning on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). DALK was performed under peribulbar anesthesia using the BB technique.

After trephination to 70% depth, air was injected with a bent 30-gauge needle. The first attempt failed to produce a bubble. A second injection caused diffuse stromal whitening with numerous intrastromal microbubbles, suggesting intrastromal emphysema. No definite BB was visualized, so the surgeon proceeded with manual dissection to bare deep stroma. The donor lenticule was sutured with 10–0 nylon without intraoperative perforation.

On day 1, slit-lamp examination revealed a clear graft with a double AC [Figure 1]. AS-OCT confirmed complete DM detachment with fluid at the graft–host interface. Retrospective surgical video review revealed a fleeting, thin, central bubble during the second injection – consistent with a type 2 BB. Its transparency and the corneal whitening from superficial trephination likely obscured it intraoperatively.

Postoperative day 1 showing double anterior chamber. (a) Slit-lamp photograph showing a double anterior chamber. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography demonstrating descemet membrane detachment with interface fluid.
Figure 1: Postoperative day 1 showing double anterior chamber. (a) Slit-lamp photograph showing a double anterior chamber. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography demonstrating descemet membrane detachment with interface fluid.

By day 3, partial resorption of the interface air unmasked a central DM tear [Figure 2]. The patient underwent intracameral air descemetopexy, filling two-thirds of the chamber. Because the detachment was large and central with a DM tear and shallow chamber, a transcorneal suture (10–0 nylon) was added across the tear to ensure firm apposition and prevent re-detachment [Figure 3]. This approach was chosen based on prior reports demonstrating that transcorneal suturing provides mechanical support in refractory or extensive DM detachments when air or SF6 alone is insufficient.[7]

Day 3 showing partial resorption of interface air with central Descemet membrane tear. (a) Slit-lamp photograph on postoperative day 3. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography showing central descemet membrane tear and persistent detachment.
Figure 2: Day 3 showing partial resorption of interface air with central Descemet membrane tear. (a) Slit-lamp photograph on postoperative day 3. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography showing central descemet membrane tear and persistent detachment.
Intraoperative image showing transcorneal suture placement across the Descemet membrane tear after descemetopexy.
Figure 3: Intraoperative image showing transcorneal suture placement across the Descemet membrane tear after descemetopexy.

By the next day, complete reattachment of DM and a single AC was confirmed [Figure 4]. One-month follow-up showed a clear cornea and uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40.

Post-procedure confirmation of reattachment. (a) Slit-lamp photograph showing reattached Descemet membrane and clear cornea. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirming reattachment of descemet membrane with restoration of a single anterior chamber. OD: Oculus dexter (right eye).
Figure 4: Post-procedure confirmation of reattachment. (a) Slit-lamp photograph showing reattached Descemet membrane and clear cornea. (b) Anterior segment optical coherence tomography confirming reattachment of descemet membrane with restoration of a single anterior chamber. OD: Oculus dexter (right eye).

DISCUSSION

Double AC formation occurs in 5–20% of DALK cases, mostly due to microperforation or incomplete DM adhesion.[4,5] In this case, a missed intraoperative type 2 BB was the cause. Such bubbles form in the deep potential space between Dua’s layer and DM and are easily overlooked because of their extreme thinness and transparency. Their rupture allows aqueous ingress into the interface, producing a secondary DM detachment.

This report is among the few to document post-operative double AC due to an unrecognized type 2 BB, confirmed retrospectively from the surgical video. The case reinforces that even in the absence of visible perforation, type 2 BB formation must be considered when unexplained DM detachment occurs.

Type 2 bubbles occur more often in advanced keratoconus with extremely thin corneas, where altered cleavage planes promote deeper dissection.[3,8] Preventive measures include injecting a small air bubble into the AC before dissection to detect unintended DM separation, avoiding complete corneal whitening by limiting intrastromal air, and keeping the periphery clear to observe any AC movement.[9]

If missed, type 2 BBs can lead to spontaneous DM tear, pupillary block from trapped air, or interface scarring if left untreated.

Management depends on the extent and integrity of DM. Spontaneous reattachment may occur in minor cases,[10]but large or central detachments with DM tears require prompt air descemetopexy. When the chamber is shallow or tear extensive, adding a transcorneal suture stabilizes DM, prevents recurrence, and avoids pupillary block.[7]

Early recognition, careful intraoperative visualization, and awareness of type 2 BB behavior are crucial to avoid this complication and achieve good visual outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A missed intraoperative type 2 big bubble is an important and likely under-recognized cause of early postoperative double anterior chamber after DALK. Careful intraoperative observation, especially in advanced keratoconus with very thin corneas, is essential to identify this fragile and easily overlooked bubble. Prompt recognition and timely management with intracameral air, with or without transcorneal suturing depending on the extent of Descemet membrane tear and detachment, can lead to successful anatomical reattachment and good visual recovery.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Differentiating type 1 from type 2 big bubbles in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1155-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Intraoperative review of different bubble types formed during pneumodissection (big-bubble) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2015;34:621-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Management of type 2 bubble formed during big bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2019;38:189-93.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261:3097-111.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Factors predictive of double anterior chamber formation following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;205:11-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Late spontaneous resolution of a double anterior chamber post deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31:58-60.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Transcorneal sutures in persistent double anterior chamber after DALK. Cornea. 2002;21:164-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:254-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Use of a “small-bubble technique” to increase the success of Anwar's “big-bubble technique” for deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete baring of Descemet's membrane. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:1369-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , . Spontaneous attachment of detached Descemet membrane following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019;67:1698-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections