Translate this page into:
Suture removal-related endophthalmitis

*Corresponding author: Haimanti Choudhury, Department of Cataract and Oculoplasty, Choudhury Eye Hospital and Research Centre, Silchar, Assam, India. drhaimanti@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite this article: Choudhury H, Choudhury H, Mansoor SA. Suture removal-related endophthalmitis. Lat Am J Ophthalmol. 2025;8:9. doi: 10.25259/LAJO_4_2025
Abstract
A 12-year-old male patient presented with a sudden loss of vision, pain, and redness in the left eye (LE). He gave a history of suture removal in LE, 1 day before at another hospital. He gave a history of iridodialysis repair in LE 6 months back. Slit-lamp examination showed ciliary congestion hypopyon; ultrasound scan showed hyperechoic debris in mid and posterior vitreous suggestive of suture removal-related endophthalmitis. Pars plana vitrectomy, vitreous biopsy, and intravitreal antibiotics were done, but the patient’s eye could not be salvaged. This case emphasizes that endophthalmitis can occur as early as 24 h after a minor procedure like suture removal. Care should be taken while cutting sutures in outdoor settings and must be done under cover of 5% povidone iodine.
Keywords
Endophthalmitis
Povidone iodine
Suture removal
INTRODUCTION
A 12-year-old male patient was referred to our center with sudden loss of vision, pain, and redness in the left eye (LE). He gave a history of suture removal in LE, 1 day before at another hospital. On inquiring further, he reported that his LE was injured 6 months back, for which he was operated. His discharge slip showed iridodialysis repair (LE) under local anesthesia. On examination, his vision was perception of light (PL) in LE. The anterior segment showed ciliary congestion, hazy cornea, hypopyon, and seclusio pupillae [Figure 1a]. The fundal glow was not visible. Intraocular pressure was normal. Ultrasound (B scan) showed hyperechoic debris in the mid and posterior vitreous and attached retina [Figure 1b and c]. Diagnosis of suture removal-related endophthalmitis was made. Pars plana vitrectomy with vitreous biopsy was done on the day of presentation. Intravitreal vancomycin (1 mg/0.1 mL), ceftazidine (2.25 mg/0.1 mL), and dexamethasone (400 µ/0.1 mL) were injected. The vitreous smear did not show any organism on the Gram stain and potassium hydroxide mount. On the first follow-up, fibrin in the anterior chamber was contracting, and the pupil was semi-dilated [Figure 1d]. Vision in LE was hand motions (HM). He was put on topical 1% prednisolone eye drop, 1% atropine eye drop, and 0.5% moxifloxacin eye drop. On 3rd post-operative day, vitreous culture did not show any growth. The anterior chamber was devoid of hypopyon, and the cornea was clear [Figure 1e], but the view to the fundus was still obscured due to vitreous exudate. Vision further deteriorated to PL on the 7th post-operative day. He was planned for repeat vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotic. The patient returned after 2 weeks, and repeat vitrectomy and intravitreal antibiotic were injected. On the last follow-up (6 weeks later), his vision was PL negative. Infection was controlled, intraocular pressure (IOP) was 02 mmHg, and the LE was pre-phthisical.

- (a) 12-year-old male presented with sudden loss of vision, pain, and redness in the left eye. Anterior segment showed ciliary congestion, hazy cornea, hypopyon, and seclusio pupillae. (b) Ultrasound scan showed hyperechoic debris in mid vitreous and attached retina. (c) Ultrasound scan showed hyperechoic debris in posterior vitreous and attached retina. (d) On the first follow-up after pars plana vitrectomy and intravitreal injection, fibrin in anterior chamber contracted and pupil was semi-dilated. (e) On 3rd post-operative day, anterior chamber was devoid of hypopyon and the cornea was clear. View to fundus was still obscured due to vitreous exudate.
DISCUSSION
This case underscores that endophthalmitis can occur as early as 24 h after a minor procedure like suture removal. Suture removal by the referring surgeon was done at slit-lamp with a sterile 26-gauge needle and plain forceps (present case). 5% Povidone-iodine was not used before suture removal. Antibiotic drop was used after suture removal.
Risk factors for suture removal-related endophthalmitis:[1,2,3]
Wound leakage or dehiscence
Premature suture removal or loose suture
Lack of antimicrobial prophylaxis
Immunosuppression
Infection of surrounding adnexa.
Suture removal-related endophthalmitis, though rare, is encountered commonly in the pediatric age group and runs a fulminant course. Panchal et al., have reported the single largest series of endophthalmitis following suture removal consisting of 11 patients. 8 of them belonged to the pediatric population. The most commonly implicated organism was Streptococcus pneumoniae. Visual outcome was poor in spite of early diagnosis and prompt treatment. Only 3 eyes had a visual outcome of 20/200 or better; 1 had a vision of HM, 6 eyes became phthisical, and 1 eye was eviscerated.[1]
Forstot et al. reported 3 cases in whom the primary procedure done was penetrating keratoplasty (PK). 2 of the 3 cases ended up in evisceration/phthisis bulbi.[2] Weiss et al., reported one case of endophthalmitis after suture removal in PK, wherein the final visual acuity was ≥20/200.[4] Culbert and Devenyi reported that 3 cases of endophthalmitis after suture removal were done for cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. One of them had final visual acuity ≥20/200.[5] Lim et al. reported one case of endophthalmitis after suture removal was done for cataract extraction with IOL implantation; the patient attained 6/18 in the final follow-up.[6] Staropoli et al. reported two similar cases following suture removal, where the primary procedure was IOL exchange.[3]
Mean duration from the removal of the suture to the diagnosis of endophthalmitis in Panchal et al., study group was 5.3 days; in the other reported studies, it ranged from 2 to 15 days.[1,2,4-6] Our case is unique in this regard as the patient developed endophthalmitis within 24 h of suture removal. This is the first such report of suture removal-related endophthalmitis, where the duration from suture removal to diagnosis is <24 h.
We have also analyzed the preparation of the eye before suture removal in all cases reported in the literature. In the study by Panchal et al., all patients received 5% povidone-iodine before and after suture removal; removal was done with sterile forceps, and patients received topical antibiotics for 1 week post-suture removal.[1] Forstot et al., have advocated the use of topical antibiotics before and after suture removal.[2] In the 3 cases reported by Culbert and Devenyi, prophylactic antibiotics were used, but povidone-iodine was not used.[5] Lim et al., did not use antibiotic coverage while suture removal. Mention of povidone-iodine is not done, which suggests that it was not used.[6] Staropoli et al. did not use either povidone iodine or topical antibiotic during suture removal.[3]
As is evident, despite all prophylactic measures (as in Panchal et al., study),[1] endophthalmitis can still occur after suture removal. We recommend certain measures as prophylaxis of suture removal-related endophthalmitis.
Care should be taken while cutting suture at the slit lamp
5% povidone-iodine application before and after suture removal
Suture should be cut with a sterile 26-gauge needle, either at the entry or exit point of the loop; not in the center which is incommon practice
Cut suture should be pulled out with a sterile plain forceps
This should be followed by putting a 5% povidone-iodine eye drop
Antibiotic eye drops for 1 week post-suture removal.
Kokolakis et al. have rightly pointed out the suture removal technique. The cut should be in one of the external corners of the loop so that the exposed part does not gain entry into the eye and thus cannot carry microorganism through the suture track.[7]
CONCLUSION
Suture removal following any intraocular surgery must be handled with care and caution. Although it is a minor procedure, it can be complicated by visually devastating condition like endophthalmitis. Owing to the fulminant nature of the disease, prompt diagnosis and aggressive management often fail to deliver favorable visual outcome. 5% povidone-iodine must be included in the eye preparation before and after suture removal.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval is not required.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation
The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
References
- Endophthalmitis following suture removal-clinical outcomes and microbiological profile. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34:115-23.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bacterial endophthalmitis following suture removal after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;80:509-12.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Endophthalmitis after corneal suture removal. JCRS Online Case Rep. 2022;10:e00073.
- [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bacterial endophthalmitis following penetrating keratoplasty suture removal. Cornea. 1985;3:278-80.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bacterial endophthalmitis after suture removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:725-7.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Acute post-cataract-surgery endophthalmitis after suture removal. Philipp J Ophthalmol. 2005;30:137-40.
- [Google Scholar]
- Endophthalmitis after suture removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:632.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]